FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation
Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review
Abbott Infinity problems?
Abbott cases were centralized as MDL 3194 on October 2, 2026. See if your case qualifies now.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3194 underway · deadlines vary by state.
Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?
Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →
No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Abbott Infinity patients reporting shocks, lead migration, battery failures, or revision surgery may qualify for the Abbott spinal cord stimulator litigation. Infinity 5 and 7 systems are included in Abbott’s 2023 Class I recall for MRI-mode lockup. Plaintiffs also allege rapid lead migration and shocks in Infinity systems, and that Abbott reps programmed Infinity devices without physician supervision.
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.
Reported problems in this system
- Painful shocks, jolts, and overstimulation
- lead migration or fracture requiring reoperation
- battery and charging failures
- MRI-mode lockout (2023 Class I recall)
- loss of pain relief after a successful trial
- infection and battery-site complications. (Counts from FDA’s MAUDE database; reports are not verified causation.)
Is this your device?
Check your patient ID card — it lists the model. No card? Your charger or phone app identifies it, and your operative report names it; we obtain that for you. This model appears in Abbott’s Class I recall — if you received the recall letter, keep it.
What matters most in Abbott Infinity cases
Infinity patients who lost stimulation after an MRI — even once — should document that event; it is the recall defect in action.
Do you qualify?
- ✓ Revision, replacement, or removal surgery
- ✓ Shocks or burns
- ✓ Migration on imaging
- ✓ Infection
- ✓ Neurological symptoms
“It just stopped working”? Read our honest triage before deciding you don’t qualify — most patients have more than they think.
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Frequently Asked Questions
What Abbott litigation does the Infinity fall under?
Do I need documents to start an Infinity claim?
Sources (2)
What does the FDA adverse event record show for the Abbott Infinity SCS?
FDA adverse event reports for the Abbott Infinity SCS total just 52, a small number, with injury the leading event type at 28 reports.
The Abbott Infinity generator shows a small number of SCS-coded FDA adverse event reports, 52 total, with 28 classified as injury and 23 as malfunction. Reporting was concentrated early, with 15 reports in 2019 falling to single digits by 2022 and none logged in 2024, 2025, or 2026. The leading product problem is a premature elective replacement indicator, cited in 28 reports, followed by 7 reports with no identified device or use problem and 6 battery problem reports. This remains a small dataset next to other Abbott SCS platforms, and attorneys reviewing spinal cord stimulator claims use these reports as investigative leads, not proof of defect.
| Year received | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 15 |
| 2020 | 3 |
| 2021 | 2 |
| 2022 | 5 |
| 2023 | 2 |
| 2024 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 |
| 2026 (through Aug) | 0 |
Source: FDA MAUDE database via openFDA, product code LGW (spinal cord stimulator, totally implanted), retrieved August 2026. MAUDE reports are submitted by manufacturers, clinicians, and patients; they are not independently verified, may include duplicates, and do not establish that a device caused the reported event.
Read next
Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).