FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation
Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review
St. Jude Eon or Eon Mini problems?
Abbott cases were centralized as MDL 3194 on October 2, 2026. See if your case qualifies now.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3194 underway · deadlines vary by state.
Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?
Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →
No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
St. Jude Eon / Eon Mini patients reporting shocks, lead migration, battery failures, or revision surgery may qualify for the Abbott spinal cord stimulator litigation. Legacy St. Jude Eon and Eon Mini systems — now Abbott’s responsibility — generated roughly 18,000 FDA reports, with battery failures prominent, including a historical charging-burn recall family (2010–2013). Eon patients often had devices replaced by newer Abbott systems after failures.
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.
Reported problems in this system
- Painful shocks, jolts, and overstimulation
- lead migration or fracture requiring reoperation
- battery and charging failures
- loss of pain relief after a successful trial
- infection and battery-site complications. (Counts from FDA’s MAUDE database; reports are not verified causation.)
Is this your device?
Check your patient ID card — it lists the model. No card? Your charger or phone app identifies it, and your operative report names it; we obtain that for you.
What matters most in St. Jude Eon / Eon Mini cases
If your Eon failed and was replaced by a Proclaim or Infinity that also failed, you may have a multi-device Abbott case — say so at intake.
Do you qualify?
- ✓ Revision, replacement, or removal surgery
- ✓ Shocks or burns
- ✓ Migration on imaging
- ✓ Infection
- ✓ Neurological symptoms
“It just stopped working”? Read our honest triage before deciding you don’t qualify — most patients have more than they think.
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Frequently Asked Questions
What Eon Mini problems qualify for the lawsuit?
How much time do I have to file an Eon Mini claim?
Sources (2)
What does the FDA adverse event history show for the Eon Mini?
FDA adverse event reports for the Eon Mini total 19,707, with injury the dominant event type at 17,743 reports.
FDA adverse event reports for the Eon Mini total 19,707, with 17,743 classified as injury and 1,893 as malfunction. Annual counts peaked at 1,844 in 2020 and have declined steadily since, falling to 216 in 2024 and just 125 in 2025 as this older device is used less often. The leading product problem is an adverse event without an identified device or use problem, cited in 3,451 reports, followed by 3,355 reports of use of device problem, 2,429 temperature problem reports, and 2,236 reports involving communication or transmission problems. Attorneys reviewing spinal cord stimulator claims use these reports as investigative leads, not proof of defect.
| Year received | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 1,728 |
| 2020 | 1,844 |
| 2021 | 896 |
| 2022 | 583 |
| 2023 | 389 |
| 2024 | 216 |
| 2025 | 125 |
| 2026 (through Aug) | 45 |
Source: FDA MAUDE database via openFDA, product code LGW (spinal cord stimulator, totally implanted), retrieved August 2026. MAUDE reports are submitted by manufacturers, clinicians, and patients; they are not independently verified, may include duplicates, and do not establish that a device caused the reported event.
Read next
- spinal cord stimulator lawsuit overview
- do I qualify for the spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?
- Boston Scientific WaveWriter Lawsuit
- Boston Scientific Precision Lawsuit & Problems
- Medtronic Intellis Lawsuit & Problems
- Nevro Senza / HFX Lawsuit & Problems
- FDA MAUDE reports by stimulator model
- Spinal Cord Stimulator Horror Stories vs. the FDA Record
Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).