Matt Marin, Founding Partner, Marin & Murphy Law Firm
FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation

No fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Super Lawyers® 2014–2024CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review

Boston Scientific stimulator problems?

Federal cases are consolidated in MDL 3181. Two minutes tells you whether yours belongs there.

ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3181 underway · deadlines vary by state.

Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?

Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →

No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Attorney Matthew T. MarinOr talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Attorneys Stefanie A. Murphy and Matthew T. Marin of Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin

Partners

Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.

Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.

Boston Scientific is the first spinal cord stimulator manufacturer to face consolidated federal litigation. On June 5, 2026, the JPML centralized the federal cases into MDL 3181 in the Central District of California before Judge Josephine L. Staton (Dkt. 2:26-ml-03181). Plaintiffs allege WaveWriter and Precision stimulators fail at unacceptable rates — leads migrating and fracturing, devices shocking patients, batteries failing — and that the company modified the devices repeatedly after FDA approval without new clinical testing while failing to warn about known failure modes.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

⚖️

See if you qualify

A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.

  • 🔒 Confidential
  • No obligation
  • ⏱ ~2 minutes

Get started

Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime

Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.

Litigation updates

August 5, 2026: The FDA posted a Class I recall of Boston Scientific’s Infinion CX stimulator leads (Recall Z-2879-2026) — lead-fracture risk at the anchor site — and the court held MDL 3181’s initial status conference the same week.

June 5, 2026: The JPML created MDL 3181, consolidating cases from multiple districts, while declining industry-wide consolidation.

Devices involved

WaveWriter Alpha™ family · Precision™ family (Spectra, Novi, Montage). FDA records show more than 350 post-approval supplements on Boston Scientific’s stimulator system (PMA P030017), only a few involving new clinical-trial review. Since 2020, FDA’s MAUDE database contains roughly 42,000 adverse event reports naming Boston Scientific neurostimulation devices (reports are not verified causation).

What plaintiffs allege

  • Lead migration and fracture requiring revision or removal surgery
  • sudden painful shocks and overstimulation
  • battery and charging failures including device heating
  • failure to warn physicians and patients
  • post-approval design changes without adequate testing.

Do you qualify?

You may qualify if you received one of these devices and experienced any of the following:

  • ✓ Revision, replacement, or removal (explant) surgery
  • ✓ Electrical shocks, jolts, or burning at the battery site
  • ✓ Lead migration or fracture shown on imaging
  • ✓ Infection requiring treatment or surgery
  • ✓ New weakness, numbness, paralysis, or bowel/bladder problems

“It just stopped working”? Alone, generally not enough — paired with any additional procedure, it is. Many people disqualify themselves wrongly; the review is free.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator class action?
Not a class action — an MDL (consolidated individual lawsuits). Your compensation depends on your individual injuries.
What is MDL 3181?
The federal consolidation of Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator cases in the Central District of California, created June 5, 2026, for coordinated discovery and pretrial rulings.
My WaveWriter was removed years ago — can I still file?
Possibly — deadlines run from when you knew the device caused your injury and vary by state. Courts dismissed late filers in July 2026; check your state’s deadline now.
Does my case go to California?
Qualifying federal cases transfer to MDL 3181 for pretrial proceedings; if not resolved, they return to your home district for trial.
Was the Infinion CX lead recalled?
Yes — a Class I recall posted August 5, 2026, covering unused Infinion CX lead kits, because lead bodies may fracture under stress at the anchor site. If one is implanted in you and your stimulation has weakened or cut out, ask your clinic for a device interrogation.
Sources (4)
  1. JPML, Transfer Order, MDL No. 3181 (June 5, 2026); C.D. Cal. Dkt. 2:26-ml-03181-JLS-E.
  2. FDA PMA database, P030017 supplement records.
  3. FDA MAUDE database, product code LGW (reports are not verified causation).
  4. FDA, Class 1 Device Recall, Infinion CX Leads, Z-2879-2026 (posted Aug. 5, 2026).

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).