Updated August 2026 by Matthew T. Marin, Esq. (Super Lawyers, 2019–2022, and Rising Stars, 2014–2018, selected by Thomson Reuters using its published selection process; member of the American Association for Justice, and Mass Torts Made Perfect (MTMP) speaker) — a personal-injury and mass-tort trial attorney.

Matt Marin, Founding Partner, Marin & Murphy Law Firm
FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation

No fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Super Lawyers® 2014–2024CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review

What could your stimulator case be worth?

No settlement exists yet. What you can know today is whether your case qualifies — free, in two minutes.

ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3181 underway · deadlines vary by state.

Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?

Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →

No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Attorney Matthew T. MarinOr talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Attorneys Stefanie A. Murphy and Matthew T. Marin of Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin

Partners

Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.

Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.

Updated August 2026 by Matthew T. Marin, Esq. (Super Lawyers, 2019–2022, and Rising Stars, 2014–2018, selected by Thomson Reuters using its published selection process; member of the American Association for Justice, and Mass Torts Made Perfect (MTMP) speaker) — a personal-injury and mass-tort trial attorney.

There is no spinal cord stimulator settlement as of August 2026 — any site quoting you a specific settlement amount is projecting, including this one. What we can do honestly is show you how comparable medical device litigations actually paid, what drives individual case value, and where the litigation stands. Projections based on those comparisons suggest a realistic range of roughly $25,000 for straightforward revision cases to over $250,000 for severe injuries if the litigation resolves favorably — and $0 if it does not. These ranges are drawn from other device litigation and are not results obtained by Marin & Murphy Law Firm; results vary, and no outcome in other cases predicts or guarantees a similar result in any other matter.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

⚖️

See if you qualify

A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.

  • 🔒 Confidential
  • No obligation
  • ⏱ ~2 minutes

Get started

Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime

Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.

Where the litigation actually stands

Federal Boston Scientific cases were consolidated into MDL 3181 (C.D. Cal.) on June 5, 2026; the initial status conference was held August 5, 2026. Abbott and Nevro centralization petitions are pending at the JPML. No bellwether has been tried, no manufacturer has settled, and courts have dismissed some cases on federal preemption grounds — outcomes here are genuinely uncertain, which is exactly why settlement “quotes” you may see elsewhere deserve skepticism.

How comparable device litigations actually paid

Litigation How it resolved Typical per-person amounts
Bard hernia mesh (MDL 2846) Global settlement announced Oct. 2024, now paying ~$25,000 quick-pay tier; ~$60,000–$70,000 projected for complex claims; weak claims ~$2,500
DePuy ASR hip (recall-driven) Global settlement after verdicts ~$250,000 base awards
IVC filters Inventory settlements Low five figures to low six figures by injury
Philips CPAP Global settlement 2023–24 Averages under $20,000 for most claims
Covidien hernia mesh $88M first bellwether verdict (Aug. 4, 2026), judgment not final (post-trial motions pending); settlement posture TBD Verdicts ≠ settlement averages — bellwether numbers historically compress 10–50× in global deals

Two lessons from every one of these: severity tiers decide everything — the difference between a records-thin claim and a documented revision-plus-complications claim is routinely 10× — and headline verdicts are not settlement checks.

What would drive YOUR case’s value

  • ✓ Revision or explant surgery — the single biggest factor; documented additional surgery separates tiers
  • ✓ Documented hardware failure: lead migration or fracture on imaging, shocks, battery failures, overheating
  • ✓ Permanent injury: nerve damage, paralysis, bowel or bladder dysfunction
  • ✓ Infection requiring surgical treatment
  • ✓ Economic losses: medical bills, lost work, future care
  • ✓ Timing — courts dismissed spinal cord stimulator plaintiffs as untimely in July 2026; late cases are worth $0 regardless of injury

What a fee actually looks like

Marin & Murphy handles these claims on contingency: you owe no attorney’s fee unless there is a recovery. In consolidated device litigation, fees are a percentage of your recovery, and courts also approve common-benefit assessments that fund the shared litigation effort. We explain every number before you sign anything.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average settlement for a spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?

There is no average yet, because there are no settlements yet (August 2026). Comparable device litigations paid from roughly $25,000 for straightforward claims to $250,000 or more for severe, well-documented injuries when they resolved.

I saw “$150,000 to $2 million” online — is that real?

Those figures largely describe individual verdicts, workers’ compensation outcomes, and malpractice cases — not mass tort settlements. They are not a quote for this litigation.

When would spinal cord stimulator settlements happen?

If the litigation succeeds, realistic timelines based on comparable consolidated litigation run to roughly 2029–2031. Anyone promising faster is guessing.

Does it cost anything to find out if I qualify?

No. Case reviews are free, and representation is contingency-based — no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Sources (5)
  1. MDL 2846 (Bard hernia mesh) settlement administration reporting (2024–2026).
  2. DePuy ASR settlement agreement, public terms.
  3. Philips CPAP settlement filings (2023–2024).
  4. Patterson v. Covidien, No. 1:22-cv-10153 (D. Mass., MDL 3029), verdict Aug. 4, 2026.
  5. JPML, Transfer Order, MDL No. 3181 (June 5, 2026); C.D. Cal. Dkt. 2:26-ml-03181.

Methodology: projections are drawn from publicly reported resolutions in comparable device litigation applied to this litigation’s injury profile. They are projections, not promises; litigation outcomes are inherently uncertain and this litigation may resolve for nothing.

Read next

Related on Spinal Cord Stimulator claims

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).