FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation
Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review
Boston Scientific Precision problems?
Federal Precision cases are consolidated in MDL 3181. Two minutes tells you whether yours belongs there.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3181 underway · deadlines vary by state.
Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?
Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →
No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Boston Scientific Precision patients reporting shocks, lead migration, battery failures, or revision surgery may qualify for the Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator litigation. The Precision family (Spectra, Novi, Montage) is among the most-reported systems in FDA’s database — roughly 40,000 reports all-time — and legacy Precision patients often carry devices a decade old with dead or dying batteries.
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.
Reported problems in this system
- Painful shocks, jolts, and overstimulation
- lead migration or fracture requiring reoperation
- battery and charging failures
- loss of pain relief after a successful trial
- infection and battery-site complications. (Counts from FDA’s MAUDE database; reports are not verified causation.)
Is this your device?
Check your patient ID card — it lists the model. No card? Your charger or phone app identifies it, and your operative report names it; we obtain that for you.
What matters most in Boston Scientific Precision cases
Long-implanted Precision systems raise encapsulation and abandoned-hardware issues — a failed device you can’t remove is itself a claimed injury.
Do you qualify?
- ✓ Revision, replacement, or removal surgery
- ✓ Shocks or burns
- ✓ Migration on imaging
- ✓ Infection
- ✓ Neurological symptoms
“It just stopped working”? Read our honest triage before deciding you don’t qualify — most patients have more than they think.
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Frequently Asked Questions
What is MDL 3181 and does it cover Precision claims?
What records do I need to start a Precision claim?
Sources (2)
What do FDA adverse event reports show for the Boston Scientific Precision?
FDA adverse event reports for the Boston Scientific Precision family total 48,325, with injury the dominant event type at 42,953 reports.
FDA adverse event reports for the Boston Scientific Precision family total 48,325, with 42,953 classified as injury and 5,146 as malfunction. Annual counts fell from 3,898 in 2019 down to 2,177 in 2024, before ticking back up to 2,446 in 2025 and continuing into the 2026 reporting period. The leading product problem is an adverse event without an identified device or use problem, cited in 11,105 reports, followed by 10,612 charging problem reports, 6,735 reports of no apparent adverse event, and 5,182 reports of unexpected therapeutic results. Attorneys reviewing spinal cord stimulator claims use these reports as investigative leads, not proof of defect.
| Year received | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 3,898 |
| 2020 | 2,891 |
| 2021 | 3,006 |
| 2022 | 2,411 |
| 2023 | 2,195 |
| 2024 | 2,177 |
| 2025 | 2,446 |
| 2026 (through Aug) | 1,002 |
Source: FDA MAUDE database via openFDA, product code LGW (spinal cord stimulator, totally implanted), retrieved August 2026. MAUDE reports are submitted by manufacturers, clinicians, and patients; they are not independently verified, may include duplicates, and do not establish that a device caused the reported event.
Read next
- spinal cord stimulator lawsuit overview
- do I qualify for the spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?
- Medtronic Intellis Lawsuit & Problems
- Nevro Senza / HFX Lawsuit & Problems
- Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit overview
- Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit (MDL 3181)
- The Sales Rep in Your Operating Room
- When Surgeons Won’t Remove Your Stimulator
Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).