FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation
Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review
Nevro Senza or HFX problems?
Nevro cases were centralized as MDL 3195 on October 2, 2026. See if your case qualifies now.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3195 underway · deadlines vary by state.
Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?
Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →
No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Nevro Senza / HFX patients reporting shocks, lead migration, battery failures, or revision surgery may qualify for the Nevro spinal cord stimulator litigation. Senza, Senza II, Omnia, and HFX iQ built Nevro’s “paresthesia-free” 10 kHz franchise. Plaintiffs allege the marketing promised what the implants didn’t deliver — the trial-to-implant gap is central to Nevro cases, and a JPML consolidation petition was filed June 26, 2026.
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.
Reported problems in this system
- Painful shocks, jolts, and overstimulation
- lead migration or fracture requiring reoperation
- battery and charging failures
- loss of pain relief after a successful trial
- infection and battery-site complications. (Counts from FDA’s MAUDE database; reports are not verified causation.)
Is this your device?
Check your patient ID card — it lists the model. No card? Your charger or phone app identifies it, and your operative report names it; we obtain that for you.
What matters most in Nevro Senza / HFX cases
Nevro patients: your trial dates and your implant outcome dates, side by side, are the core of the case. Document both.
Do you qualify?
- ✓ Revision, replacement, or removal surgery
- ✓ Shocks or burns
- ✓ Migration on imaging
- ✓ Infection
- ✓ Neurological symptoms
“It just stopped working”? Read our honest triage before deciding you don’t qualify — most patients have more than they think.
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Frequently Asked Questions
What Senza or HFX symptoms may qualify for a claim?
Are Nevro Senza and HFX cases being consolidated?
Sources (2)
What does FDA adverse event data show for the Nevro Senza?
FDA adverse event reports for the Nevro Senza family total 6,368, with injury the dominant event type at 5,178 reports.
FDA adverse event reports for the Nevro Senza family total 6,368, with 5,178 classified as injury and 218 as malfunction. Annual counts rose from 510 in 2019 to a peak of 1,153 in 2024 before easing to 952 in 2025. Death is coded in 971 reports; the large majority of manufacturer death reports state that no causal link to the device was established, and reports are filed when a patient dies with a device implanted regardless of cause. The leading product problem is an adverse event without an identified device or use problem, cited in 6,008 reports. Attorneys reviewing spinal cord stimulator claims use these reports as investigative leads, not proof of defect.
| Year received | MAUDE reports |
|---|---|
| 2019 | 510 |
| 2020 | 427 |
| 2021 | 584 |
| 2022 | 615 |
| 2023 | 782 |
| 2024 | 1,153 |
| 2025 | 952 |
| 2026 (through Aug) | 311 |
Source: FDA MAUDE database via openFDA, product code LGW (spinal cord stimulator, totally implanted), retrieved August 2026. MAUDE reports are submitted by manufacturers, clinicians, and patients; they are not independently verified, may include duplicates, and do not establish that a device caused the reported event.
Read next
- spinal cord stimulator lawsuit overview
- do I qualify for the spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?
- Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit overview
- Boston Scientific SCS Lawsuit (MDL 3181)
- Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
- Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit
- Documenting Decline After a Spinal Cord Stimulator
- Wrongful Death After Stimulator Complications
Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).