Matthew T. Marin, Ozempic and GLP-1 lawsuit attorney at Marin & Murphy Law Firm

FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIESStomach injuries & NAION vision loss

Free confidential case review — no fee unless there is a recovery

Marin & MurphySuper Lawyers® 2014–2024(888) 348-2735

Ozempic (GLP-1) Lawsuit — Free Case Review

Your Stomach Symptoms Were Real

If you took brand-name Ozempic, Wegovy, or Rybelsus and were diagnosed with a tested, documented stomach injury with an ER or hospital visit, you may qualify.

No Ozempic or other GLP-1 lawsuit has been settled, and no court or jury has found that these medications caused anyone's injury — the litigation is ongoing, with major expert-evidence rulings still ahead. Whether any individual has a claim depends on their own medical records and the law of their state.

Did this happen to you — or someone you love?

Answered 24/7 · Free & confidential · No fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney's fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

(888) 348-2735

Matthew T. Marin & Stefanie A. Murphy

Partners

Matthew T. Marin & Stefanie A. Murphy

Super Lawyers® honorees · American Association for Justice members

Ozempic inquiries get a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.

No Ozempic or other GLP-1 lawsuit has been settled, and no court or jury has found that these medications caused anyone's injury — the litigation is ongoing, with major expert-evidence rulings still ahead. Whether any individual has a claim depends on their own medical records and the law of their state. Do not stop, start, or change any prescribed medication because of anything on this page. Those decisions belong with your prescriber. Attorney Advertising.

Not by itself. For NAION vision-loss claims, stopping the medication has no effect on eligibility: the criteria accept a diagnosis made while taking the drug or after stopping it, with no stated cutoff. For stomach-injury claims, the criteria require that the diagnosis was made while you were taking the medication or within about 30 days of stopping — so what matters is the date of your diagnosis, not the fact that you eventually came off the drug.

NAION track
stopping does not affect eligibility
Stomach-injury track
diagnosis while taking or within about 30 days of stopping
0 settlements
no case has resolved

Free, confidential case review. Marin & Murphy is currently accepting Ozempic (GLP-1) stomach-injury and NAION vision-loss cases. No fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted. Marin & Murphy is licensed in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and South Carolina; matters elsewhere may be referred to lawyers licensed in your state.

Start your free case review or call (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7.

⚖️

See if you qualify

A few quick questions about which GLP-1 medication you took, your diagnosis and testing, and your treatment. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.

  • 🔒 Confidential
  • No obligation
  • ⏱ ~2 minutes

Get started

Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime

What the 30-day window actually measures

People read the 30-day rule as a deadline for calling a lawyer. It is not. It is a rule about when the diagnosis was made, and it was fixed on the day your doctor made it.

The criteria ask whether gastroparesis or gastric obstruction was diagnosed while you were taking a brand-name GLP-1 or within roughly 30 days after your last dose. If your diagnosis came during use — the most common pattern — that element is satisfied no matter how long ago you stopped. The window connects the diagnosis to the exposure. It is not a limit on how long you have to ask.

Where stopping does cause a problem

One pattern the rule genuinely affects: symptoms began during use, you came off the medication, and you were not formally diagnosed until months or years later. That happens often — particularly to people told for a long stretch that nothing was wrong, or that it was an eating disorder, or that it was in their head. Delayed diagnosis here is common and it is not the patient’s doing.

If that describes you, the gap between last dose and diagnosis is what will be examined. It is also the thing most often clarified by records rather than memory — a chart note, a referral, an imaging order, or an earlier working diagnosis can sit closer to the medication than a person remembers. Tell us the sequence and let the records settle the dates. A near-miss goes to a closer review, not to an automatic no.

NAION: stopping changes nothing

The NAION criteria are explicit that a diagnosis qualifies whether made while taking the medication or after stopping, and they state no outer time limit on the diagnosis date. Someone who took Ozempic, Wegovy, Rybelsus, Trulicity, Mounjaro, or Zepbound, stopped, and was later diagnosed with NAION is not excluded on timing grounds. The criteria do require an actual NAION diagnosis and some degree of permanent vision impairment, together with brand-name use.

That is a criteria question only. Every state also sets its own filing deadline, and those apply to both tracks regardless of what screening criteria say.

An honest note about symptoms that did not go away

A great many people describe the same thing: they stopped the medication and never went back to normal. That experience is real and widely reported. It is also one of the specific points the manufacturers are contesting — they have moved to exclude expert opinion that drug-related gastroparesis persists after the medication is discontinued and cleared from the body, as part of the briefing for the Rule 702 hearing held September 14 through 18, 2026.

We say so because it is true, and because it explains why documentation of the period after stopping matters as much as documentation from during use. Follow-up visits, repeat testing, weight records, nutrition consults, and hospital admissions after the last dose are the record of persistence.

Free, confidential case review. Marin & Murphy is currently accepting Ozempic (GLP-1) stomach-injury and NAION vision-loss cases. No fee unless there is a recovery. Marin & Murphy is licensed in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and South Carolina; matters elsewhere may be referred to lawyers licensed in your state.

Start your free case review or call (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7.

What to gather now that you are off it

  • Last-dose month and year, as precisely as you can, for each brand you took.
  • Pharmacy records. A fill-history printout is the cleanest proof of which brand you took and when, and any pharmacy will produce one on request.
  • Diagnosis month and year, and whether a gastric emptying study was performed. “I’m not sure what tests I had” is a normal answer.
  • ER and hospital dates connected to the injury.
  • Records from after you stopped — follow-up appointments, repeat testing, ongoing treatment.
  • Physical items you still have: pens, boxes, packaging, receipts, letters and emails.

Common questions

Does stopping Ozempic disqualify me from a claim?

No. Stopping does not disqualify anyone. For the stomach-injury track the criteria look at whether the diagnosis was made while you were taking the medication or within about 30 days of stopping. For the NAION track, a diagnosis made after stopping can qualify and no cutoff date is stated.

What does the 30-day rule mean?

It refers to the timing of the diagnosis, not any deadline for contacting a lawyer. The criteria ask whether gastroparesis or gastric obstruction was diagnosed during use or within roughly 30 days after the last dose — fixed on the date of diagnosis.

My symptoms started on the drug but I was diagnosed much later. Is that a problem?

It is the situation the rule most directly affects, and it is worth reviewing rather than assuming. Delayed diagnosis is common here, and records often place a working diagnosis, referral, or test order closer to the period of use than a person remembers.

Does it matter that my symptoms continued after I stopped?

It matters to the record. Continuing symptoms after discontinuation are widely reported by patients, and they are also a point the manufacturers are actively contesting in the expert-evidence briefing heard at the September 14-18, 2026 hearing. Documentation from the period after your last dose is therefore important to preserve.

Sources
  • Current GLP-1 referral and intake criteria used for case screening (Jan. 26, 2026)
  • MDL 3094, Doc. 468 (Order, Aug. 15, 2025)
  • MDL 3094, Doc. 681 (Rule 702 motion, May 19, 2026)
  • MDL 3094, Case Management Order No. 32 (Apr. 30, 2026)
  • JPML Transfer Order, MDL No. 3163 (NAION) (Dec. 15, 2025)

No Ozempic or other GLP-1 lawsuit has been settled, and no court or jury has found that these medications caused anyone’s injury — the litigation is ongoing, with major expert-evidence rulings still ahead. Whether any individual has a claim depends on their own medical records and the law of their state.

Do not stop, start, or change any prescribed medication because of anything on this page. Those decisions belong with your prescriber.

Attorney Advertising.

This page is attorney advertising and is for informational purposes only; it is not legal or medical advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Common questions: can you sue?, it’s not about your doctor, still taking Ozempic?, is it too late to file?, still on a GLP-1, switched drugs, calling for a parent, and how compensation works.