Matt Marin, Founding Partner, Marin & Murphy Law Firm
FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation

No fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Super Lawyers® 2014–2024CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review

Behind these FDA numbers: real patients.

If your experience matches the reports on this page, two minutes tells you whether your case qualifies.

ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDLs 3181, 3194 and 3195 underway · deadlines vary by state.

Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?

Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →

No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Attorney Matthew T. MarinOr talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Attorneys Stefanie A. Murphy and Matthew T. Marin of Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin

Partners

Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.

Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.

Nobody reads the FDA’s device database, so every month we read it for you. This is the first issue of a standing series: what patients and clinicians reported to the FDA about spinal cord stimulators, in plain English, with every number cited so anyone can check it.

⚖️

See if you qualify

A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.

  • 🔒 Confidential
  • No obligation
  • ⏱ ~2 minutes

Get started

Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.

The all-time picture (as of this issue)

372,958 total adverse event reports — 268,051 injuries, 102,433 malfunctions, 1,876 deaths. Reporting is not slowing: 33,527 reports in 2023 → 35,076 in 2024 → 31,445 in 2025. Since the FDA’s 2020 warning letter, the file has more than tripled.

The breakdown

  • By manufacturer (2020–present): Abbott/St. Jude ~84,000
  • Medtronic ~56,000
  • Boston Scientific ~42,000
  • Nevro ~5,000. What fails: charging problems (41,770)
  • high impedance (35,951)
  • battery issues (29,036)
  • lead migration (~38,600)
  • overheating (12,861). What patients feel: inadequate pain relief (97,076 — the largest category)
  • pain (54,406)
  • infection (15,206)
  • burning sensation (13,720)
  • electric shock (11,032). Most-reported systems: Medtronic Intellis (41,094)
  • St. Jude Octrode leads (36,835)
  • Boston Scientific Precision family (~40,000)
  • Abbott Proclaim 5 Elite (~25,000).

Standing disclaimers — every issue, non-negotiable

MAUDE reports are not verified and do not establish causation; duplicates and incomplete entries exist; report counts are not injury rates. We publish them because the file’s scale and trajectory are themselves facts patients deserve access to — and because finding your own experience in the database is often the first proof you’re not imagining it.

If your experience matches this ledger

Report it to FDA MedWatch — it costs nothing and builds the public record. Document it in your own chart, in your words. And if it led to a second surgery, shocks, infection, or worse: the litigation exists precisely for the reports that became injuries.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.

Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is MAUDE?

The FDA’s public database of medical device adverse event reports, filed by manufacturers, clinicians, and patients.

Do these reports prove the devices are defective?

No — reports are unverified and don’t establish causation. They document scale and pattern, which is why regulators and courts pay attention to them.

How often is this page updated?

Monthly, from the FDA’s public data, with each issue archived.

How do I report my own device problem?

Through FDA MedWatch — voluntary, free, and it does not affect any legal claim.
Sources (3)
  1. FDA MAUDE database, product code LGW, counts compiled August 2026.
  2. FDA Letter to Health Care Providers (2020).
  3. FDA MedWatch voluntary reporting program.

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).