FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation
Spinal Cord Stimulator — Free Case Review
Your device was modified after approval.
The FDA modifications record is on this page. Whether your case qualifies takes two minutes to find out.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDLs 3181, 3194 and 3195 underway · deadlines vary by state.
Do you — or someone you love — have a spinal cord stimulator that caused problems?
Check if my case qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure it was the device →
No documents needed · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every spinal cord stimulator inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims target the device manufacturers — not your doctor. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Here is the single most under-reported fact in the spinal cord stimulator story: the devices implanted today are generations of modifications away from the devices the FDA originally approved — and nearly none of those modifications went through new clinical trials. Class III devices enter the market through Premarket Approval (PMA); afterward, manufacturers file supplements to change them. Most supplement types require no new human testing. Only the rare panel-track supplement does. Here is the federal record, system by system.
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your spinal cord stimulator, the problems you experienced, and any revision or removal surgery. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently accepting spinal cord stimulator cases. Free, confidential case reviews: (888) 348-2735, available 24/7.
The ledger — from the FDA’s public PMA database
Medtronic Itrel/Intellis platform (P840001, first approved 1984): 607 supplements — 1 panel-track clinical review. Boston Scientific Precision/WaveWriter (P030017, 2004): 357 supplements — 3 panel-track. Abbott/St. Jude Eon/Proclaim platform (P010032, 2002): 241 supplements — 2 panel-track. Abbott DRG (P150004, 2016): 92 supplements. Nevro Senza/HFX (P130022, 2015): 63 supplements — 2 panel-track. Industry total: roughly 1,360 supplements with fewer than 10 new clinical-trial reviews — and FDA lifecycle data shows the pace continuing at 52–94 new supplements per year across the category.
Every number above is checkable in the FDA’s public PMA database.
What this means in plain English
When your surgeon implanted “an FDA-approved device,” the phrase was technically true and practically hollow: the approval belonged to an ancestor. Medtronic’s platform was approved in 1984; it has been modified 607 times since, with one panel-track clinical review. The lawsuits’ core allegation is built on exactly this record: companies claiming the protections of rigorous FDA approval while changing the device underneath it.
Why this page exists
Patients ask “was this thing even tested?” and get marketing. This is the checkable answer. It is also the record that dissolves self-blame: you couldn’t have evaluated a device whose own regulator never re-tested its changes.
Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Call (888) 348-2735 — available 24/7, a person answers.
Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a PMA supplement?
Is modifying devices without new trials illegal?
Were spinal cord stimulators clinically tested at all?
Where does this data come from?
Sources (2)
- FDA Premarket Approval (PMA) database: P840001; P030017; P010032; P150004; P130022 (supplement records, compiled Aug. 2026).
- FDA Total Product Life Cycle data, product code LGW.
Read next
- spinal cord stimulator lawsuit
- do I qualify for the spinal cord stimulator lawsuit?
- Spinal Cord Stimulator FDA Reports
- Spinal Cord Stimulator Horror Stories vs. the FDA Record
- Spinal Cord Stimulator Complications
- FDA MAUDE reports by stimulator model
- The Sales Rep in Your Operating Room
- When Surgeons Won’t Remove Your Stimulator
Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions. Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (South Carolina).