Find Out If Your Family Has a Case
Free, confidential review by Attorney Matthew T. Marin. Answered by you, the parent or guardian. Prefer to talk? Call (888) 348-2735.
Roblox Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Case Review
State attorneys general are suing Roblox
Multiple states allege Roblox misled parents about safety. What that record means for your own family’s claim.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3166 underway · filing deadlines vary by state.
Was your child — or a child in your care — contacted or harmed by an adult through Roblox?
Check if my family has a casefree · confidential · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure what happened →
No documents needed · confidential · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every Roblox inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims are brought against Roblox Corporation and, where the facts support it, other platforms — not against your family. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
See if your family qualifies
A few quick questions, answered by you — the parent or guardian, never your child. This is the initial screening, not a full case review. Most parents finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
At least ten state attorneys general have sued Roblox over its child-safety practices since August 2025, beginning with Louisiana and continuing through Arkansas in June 2026. Each suit is a government enforcement action brought under state consumer-protection or child-safety law; each alleges, in substance, that Roblox misrepresented how safe the platform was for children and failed to prevent adults from contacting minors. Roblox disputes the allegations, and no court has found the company liable in any of these cases. The furthest-advanced case is Iowa’s, where a judge denied Roblox’s motion to dismiss in May 2026 and set trial for 8 November 2027.
These are not the same as the private lawsuits families have filed. The state cases seek penalties and court-ordered changes to how the platform operates; they do not compensate individual families. Our page on the four state settlements explains that distinction in full, and the MDL tracker follows the separate federal litigation.
The headline development: Iowa
Iowa is the case to watch, for a procedural reason rather than a rhetorical one. On May 14, 2026, the Polk County District Court denied Roblox’s motion to dismiss the state’s petition, allowing the case to proceed into discovery on the merits. The court subsequently set trial for 8 November 2027.
That makes Iowa the first Roblox child-safety case anywhere in the country with a trial date on the calendar — ahead of the federal multidistrict litigation, which has none. A denial of a motion to dismiss is not a finding that the state’s allegations are true; it is a ruling that, taken as pleaded, they state a legal claim. But it is the first substantive judicial signal in this litigation wave, and it means a state’s evidence about Roblox’s internal safety practices is now moving toward a public trial record.
The state suits, by filing date
14 August 2025 — Louisiana. Attorney General Liz Murrill filed the first state suit against Roblox, alleging the platform’s design and moderation practices exposed children to sexual predators.
7 October 2025 — Kentucky. Attorney General Russell Coleman filed suit alleging Roblox misrepresented the safety of the platform to parents.
7 November 2025 — Texas. Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Roblox under state consumer-protection law. The case has proceeded past Roblox’s initial dismissal challenge , and in August 2026 the court entered an order concerning the conduct of discovery.
11 December 2025 — Florida. Attorney General James Uthmeier filed in Baker County under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
16 December 2025 — Iowa. Attorney General Brenna Bird filed in Polk County. Motion to dismiss denied May 2026; trial set 8 November 2027.
18 December 2025 — Tennessee. Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti filed suit alleging deceptive safety representations.
4 March 2026 — Nebraska. Attorney General Mike Hilgers filed suit.
14 May 2026 — Oklahoma. Attorney General Gentner Drummond filed suit.
May 2026 — Indiana. Attorney General Todd Rokita sued both Roblox and Discord, the first state action naming the two platforms together .
11 June 2026 — Arkansas. Attorney General Tim Griffin filed suit against both Roblox and Discord .
Two other government actions that are often confused with the AG suits
19 February 2026 — Los Angeles County. The County of Los Angeles — not the State of Louisiana, despite the shared abbreviation — sued Roblox in Los Angeles Superior Court under California’s Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law. It is the first California governmental entity to bring such a case, and it is a county action, not a state one.
17 February 2026 — Georgia. The Georgia Attorney General’s office opened an investigation into Roblox’s child-safety practices. An investigation is not a lawsuit. Georgia has not filed suit as of August 2026, and an investigation may close without any action.
The Ohio case is a different kind of case entirely
In August 2026, the Ohio Attorney General moved to lead a securities class action against Roblox on behalf of investors. That case alleges the company misled shareholders about its safety practices and the risks they created for the business. It is an investor-deception case, not a child-safety case, and it does not seek anything for families or children. It is worth naming precisely because headlines frequently fold it into the count of “states suing Roblox,” which distorts what is actually happening.
Separately, two proposed class actions filed in 2026 in the Northern District of California allege child labor violations connected to Roblox’s developer-payment program — a different legal theory, a different injury, and a different plaintiff group from the child-safety cases.
What these cases seek, and what they cannot do
State enforcement suits generally seek civil penalties under the relevant statute, injunctive relief requiring specific operational changes, and sometimes disgorgement. The remedies run to the state.
They cannot compensate an individual child. A parent who reads that their state has sued Roblox has not thereby become a claimant in anything. Families pursuing individual claims do so separately, and the great majority of those federal cases are now consolidated in MDL 3166 in the Northern District of California. No court has found Roblox or any other platform liable in these cases, and there is no settlement of families’ individual claims. The federal litigation is in its early stages, and every family’s case depends on its own facts.
What the state cases do produce that matters to families is a public record. Complaints filed by attorneys general are built on investigative material, and litigation like Iowa’s — now heading toward trial — puts internal platform documents in front of a court. That record becomes available to everyone examining the same questions.
Roblox’s response
Roblox has consistently disputed the state suits, characterizing at least one as a filing that “fundamentally misrepresents how our platform works,” and has pointed to safety measures introduced since late 2025 — including facial age estimation for chat access announced in November 2025, age verification extended to all accounts from 1 May 2026, and a three-tier age-based account structure introduced from June 2026. Whether those measures address what the states allege is precisely what the litigation will decide. All allegations described on this page remain allegations, and no court has found Roblox liable.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources (12)
- Office of the Louisiana Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox (14 Aug. 2025)
- Office of the Kentucky Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox (Oct. 7, 2025)
- Office of the Texas Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox (7 Nov. 2025)
- Office of the Florida Attorney General, announcement of FDUTPA suit, Baker County (11 Dec. 2025)
- Office of the Iowa Attorney General, State of Iowa v. Roblox Corp., Polk County District Court (petition filed 16 Dec. 2025); order denying motion to dismiss (14 May 2026); trial set 8 Nov. 2027
- Office of the Tennessee Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox (18 Dec. 2025)
- Office of the Nebraska Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox (4 Mar. 2026)
- Office of the Arkansas Attorney General, announcement of suit against Roblox and Discord (22 Jun. 2026)
- County of Los Angeles v. Roblox Corp., Los Angeles Superior Court (filed 19 Feb. 2026)
- Office of the Georgia Attorney General, investigation opened (Feb. 17, 2026)
- Office of the Ohio Attorney General, motion for appointment as lead plaintiff, securities class action (Aug. 2026)
- In re: Roblox Corporation Child Sexual Exploitation and Assault Litigation, No. 3:25-md-03166 (N.D. Cal.), master docket (reviewed 16 Aug. 2026). (Source: courtlistener.com docket 3:25-md-03166)
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Read next
Attorney Advertising. This page is for general information and is not legal advice; reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no attorney-client relationship is formed until a written engagement agreement is signed. Marin & Murphy Law Firm attorneys are licensed in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and South Carolina; the firm’s mass-tort practice is directed from its Charleston, South Carolina office. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, 997 Morrison Drive, Suite 200, Charleston, SC 29403. Cases may be handled together with co-counsel; whether a claim is accepted is determined after review. No representation is made that the quality of legal services is greater than that of other lawyers. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; every case depends on its own facts.