Snapchat and the child exploitation lawsuits

Find Out If Your Family Has a Case

Free, confidential review by Attorney Matthew T. Marin. Answered by you, the parent or guardian. Prefer to talk? Call (888) 348-2735.

Super Lawyers® 2014–2024CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Roblox Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Case Review

Did it move from Roblox to Snapchat?

Disappearing messages do not mean disappearing evidence. Here is how Snapchat claims fit the pattern.

ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3166 underway · filing deadlines vary by state.

Was your child — or a child in your care — contacted or harmed by an adult through Roblox?

Check if my family has a casefree · confidential · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure what happened →

No documents needed · confidential · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin

Partners

Every Roblox inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.

Claims are brought against Roblox Corporation and, where the facts support it, other platforms — not against your family. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.

Snap Inc., the company behind Snapchat, is one of four defendants identified in the December 12, 2025 order that created MDL 3166, the federal multidistrict litigation over child sexual exploitation connected to Roblox and related platforms. Fewer filed cases center on Snapchat than on Roblox or Discord, and the litigation’s center of gravity remains Roblox. Cases involving Snapchat are evaluated individually — on where contact began, how old the child was, what happened, and what documentation exists. All of the conduct described in the filings is alleged; no court has found Snap or any other platform liable.

What the filings actually say about Snapchat

When the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation centralized these cases, it described a pattern in which minors were allegedly targeted and groomed through Roblox, with the exploitation then continuing on Discord, Snapchat, Instagram, or by phone. Snapchat appears in that description as one of the destinations, not as the origin point of most claims.

That distinction matters for how a Snapchat case is assessed. The bulk of the pleading in MDL 3166 is directed at Roblox as the place first contact allegedly occurred, and increasingly at Discord as the place conversations allegedly moved. Snap is named among the defendants, but the volume of individual complaints naming Snap is smaller.

Snapchat’s design features come up in the pleadings and in public reporting for reasons parents will recognize: messages that disappear by default, a friend-discovery system, and location sharing. Plaintiffs allege that features like these make a conversation harder for a parent to see and harder to reconstruct afterward. Snap disputes the claims against it. None of these allegations has been decided by a court.

Where the Snapchat cases sit in the federal litigation

MDL 3166, In re: Roblox Corporation Child Sexual Exploitation and Assault Litigation, is before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, with Magistrate Judge Ajay Krishnan handling discovery. The panel’s transfer order names Roblox Corporation, Discord Inc., Snap Inc., and Meta Platforms, Inc., and centralized 31 pending actions from twelve districts along with dozens of potential tag-along cases.

As of August 2026, approximately 177 cases are pending in MDL 3166 before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The litigation is in active discovery, and no ruling has issued on the platforms’ threshold defenses, including Section 230.

Two procedural fights are running ahead of the merits. The first is Section 230, the federal statute the platforms are expected to invoke as a threshold defense; no ruling on it has issued. The second is arbitration — whether particular claims must be resolved outside court because of terms of service. Plaintiffs filed arbitration bellwether complaints on July 28, 2026 to test that question. Neither fight is about whether a child was harmed. Both determine where and how a claim can proceed.

Why a Snapchat case is treated as a review-track case

Families sometimes read “Snap is a defendant” as meaning any Snapchat-related experience produces a claim. It does not, and being candid about that is more useful than the alternative.

What is being evaluated is a set of facts: the platform where contact with the adult began, the child’s age when it began, the category of harm, and the documentation that exists. Where contact began on Roblox and moved to Snapchat, the analysis usually follows the Roblox track. Where the initial contact itself occurred on Snapchat, the case is reviewed individually rather than assumed to qualify — the questionnaire is completed and the file is sent for a closer look.

That is not a soft rejection. It reflects that Snap’s position in this litigation is less developed than Roblox’s, that the arbitration and Section 230 questions have not been answered, and that a family is better served by an accurate read than an optimistic one.

What harm categories are being documented

Across these cases, the categories that come up most often are sexual exploitation, sextortion, transmission or solicitation of explicit material, and grooming accompanied by documented harm. The documentation is what carries a claim: medical or therapeutic records, school records, and provider details. Pre-existing conditions do not disqualify a child if they were demonstrably made worse.

Sextortion in particular has grown as a reported category. The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children reported that sextortion reports to its CyberTipline averaged nearly 100 per day in 2024, in a year when total CyberTipline reports fell to 20.5 million from 36.2 million the year before.

If your child is in crisis, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available by call or text, 24 hours a day.

What a parent can check and preserve

Snapchat retains less by default than most platforms, which makes preservation the first practical step rather than a later one.

A parent with account access can review the friends list, the account’s Snap Map settings, and whether Family Center is enabled — Family Center shows who an account has been messaging in the last seven days without revealing message content. Snapchat also offers a “My Data” download through account settings, which returns a copy of account information by email. Saved chats, saved snaps in Memories, and screenshots a child may have taken are often the only durable record.

The same three rules apply here as anywhere in these cases. Preserve: do not delete the account, and do not clear conversations before copies exist. Don’t confront: contacting the other account leads reliably to deleted accounts and lost evidence. Report: the NCMEC CyberTipline at report.cybertip.org or 1-800-843-5678, and local law enforcement, take reports directly, and reporting neither requires nor waits on a lawyer.

You do not need to ask your child to recount what happened in order to take any of these steps. Investigators and clinicians are trained for that conversation.

What has and has not been decided

No court has found Roblox or any other platform liable in these cases, and there is no settlement of families’ individual claims. The federal litigation is in its early stages, and every family’s case depends on its own facts.

Families generally may pursue claims on behalf of a minor through a parent or legal guardian. Deadlines vary substantially by state and by claim type, and some states’ deadlines are short. Where a claim is brought against a platform rather than an individual, which deadline applies can itself be contested and may be shorter than the deadline for a claim against a perpetrator. Reviewing the specific facts is how that gets sorted out.

Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently reviewing Roblox-related claims for families nationwide.

Frequently Asked Questions

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.