Find Out If Your Family Has a Case
Free, confidential review by Attorney Matthew T. Marin. Answered by you, the parent or guardian. Prefer to talk? Call (888) 348-2735.
Roblox Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Case Review
Does your family qualify for the Roblox lawsuit?
Most parents aren’t sure. The answer turns on a few questions you can answer in two confidential minutes.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3166 underway · filing deadlines vary by state.
Was your child — or a child in your care — contacted or harmed by an adult through Roblox?
Check if my family has a casefree · confidential · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure what happened →
No documents needed · confidential · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every Roblox inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims are brought against Roblox Corporation and, where the facts support it, other platforms — not against your family. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
See if your family qualifies
A few quick questions, answered by you — the parent or guardian, never your child. This is the initial screening, not a full case review. Most parents finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Whether a family qualifies for a Roblox-related claim comes down to a short list of questions a parent or legal guardian can usually answer in a few minutes: whether your child was a minor when the contact began, where the contact started, what it led to, and what records exist. This page explains each category in plain language. It is general information, not a case evaluation — the litigation is early, criteria evolve, and the only way to know whether your family qualifies is a confidential review. No court has found Roblox or any other platform liable in these cases, and there is no settlement of families’ individual claims. The federal litigation is in its early stages, and every family’s case depends on its own facts.
Who brings the claim?
A parent or legal guardian, on the child’s behalf. Screening is answered by you, about the situation — it does not ask your child anything, and it does not ask you to describe what happened in detail. What happened belongs in a confidential conversation with an attorney, not a web form. If the survivor is now an adult who was a minor when the abuse occurred, a claim may still be possible; deadlines become more sensitive, and the review addresses them case by case.
The age question
The core screen is whether the injured person was 18 or younger when the abuse began. Cases centered on adults do not fit this litigation.
Where the contact started
Screening asks which platform the abuser first used to reach your child. Contact that began on Roblox is at the center of this litigation. Contact that began on Discord or Snapchat is evaluated as well — the filed complaints and the JPML’s own transfer order describe a pattern of contact beginning in one place and escalating in another, and Discord, Snap, and Meta are named in the consolidated litigation. Contact that began somewhere else entirely may not fit these cases, though other legal options can exist.
What the conduct led to
Qualifying situations fall into categories rather than a single definition: exploitation involving explicit material (sent or received); sextortion; abuse that progressed to in-person contact; trafficking; and grooming that was accompanied by real, documented harm to the child. Grooming alone, without more, generally does not meet the current criteria — but criteria change as the litigation develops, which is one reason screening information is retained with your consent, and a situation that does not fit today may fit later. Situations involving a child’s suicide or attempted suicide following online exploitation are evaluated individually, always.
The records question
For several categories, screening asks whether the harm is documented: medical or therapeutic records (for example, a diagnosis of depression, anxiety, or PTSD, or treatment for self-harm or suicidal ideation), or school records showing behavioral or academic change. If your child had a preexisting condition, what matters is whether the abuse made it worse — and that, too, is a records question. You do not need records in hand to be screened; knowing whether they exist is enough to start.
What you don’t need
You do not need to have saved anything. Account data, chat logs, friend lists, and transaction histories are often recoverable from the platforms — and in litigation they can be subpoenaed. You do not need a police report to be screened, though reporting to the NCMEC CyberTipline and local law enforcement is always appropriate and never requires a lawyer first. And you do not need to be certain. Most parents who contact us are not certain; that is what the review is for.
What it costs, and how it works
The review is handled through a short set of confidential questions answered by the parent or guardian, followed by a conversation with our team if the situation may fit. It is free, it is confidential, and there is no fee unless there is a recovery. There is no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted. If your family’s situation is outside the current criteria, we say so plainly — and, with your consent, keep your information so we can re-contact you if criteria change.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources (3)
- MDL 3166 docket, 3:25-md-03166 (N.D. Cal.)
- JPML Transfer Order, MDL No. 3166 (Dec. 12, 2025)
- NCMEC CyberTipline (report.cybertip.org)
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Read next
Attorney Advertising. This page is for general information and is not legal advice; reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no attorney-client relationship is formed until a written engagement agreement is signed. Marin & Murphy Law Firm attorneys are licensed in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and South Carolina; the firm’s mass-tort practice is directed from its Charleston, South Carolina office. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, 997 Morrison Drive, Suite 200, Charleston, SC 29403. Cases may be handled together with co-counsel; whether a claim is accepted is determined after review. No representation is made that the quality of legal services is greater than that of other lawyers. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; every case depends on its own facts.