Find Out If Your Family Has a Case

Free, confidential review by Attorney Matthew T. Marin. Answered by you, the parent or guardian. Prefer to talk? Call (888) 348-2735.
Roblox Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Case Review
Did it start on Roblox and move to Discord?
That path — game chat first, Discord next — is the pattern described in the federal lawsuits. It matters for your family’s case.
ACTIVE LITIGATION — NO SETTLEMENT. MDL 3166 underway · filing deadlines vary by state.
Was your child — or a child in your care — contacted or harmed by an adult through Roblox?
Check if my family has a casefree · confidential · takes 2 minutes
I’m not sure what happened →
No documents needed · confidential · an answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
Every Roblox inquiry gets a personal review — and an honest answer either way, free and without obligation.
Claims are brought against Roblox Corporation and, where the facts support it, other platforms — not against your family. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to other lawyers. No settlement has been reached, and most cases are in their earliest stages; every case must be proven on its own facts. Attorney Advertising.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
See if your family qualifies
A few quick questions, answered by you — the parent or guardian, never your child. This is the initial screening, not a full case review. Most parents finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
Discord Inc. is a named defendant in the federal child-exploitation cases consolidated as MDL 3166, alongside Roblox Corporation, Snap Inc., and Meta Platforms, Inc. The complaints allege a two-platform pattern: an adult makes first contact with a child inside a Roblox game or chat, then moves the conversation to Discord, where private servers and direct messages carry the contact away from the game’s moderation. Two state attorneys general — Indiana in May 2026 and Arkansas in June 2026 — sued Roblox and Discord together, describing that same movement. These are allegations. No court has found Discord, Roblox, or any other platform liable, and there is no settlement of families’ individual claims.
Why so many Roblox cases become Discord cases
The filed complaints describe a consistent sequence rather than a single incident. Contact begins in a shared, supervised-feeling space — a game, a chat channel, a group of players who talk while they build. The adult establishes familiarity there. Then the conversation is invited somewhere else: a Discord server, a direct message thread, a voice channel. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation described this in its December 12, 2025 transfer order, noting that the centralized cases involve minors allegedly targeted and groomed through Roblox with the exploitation continuing on Discord, Snapchat, Instagram, or by phone.
Plaintiffs allege the move off-platform is not incidental — it is the point. Once a conversation leaves the game, the game’s filters, chat logging, and reporting tools no longer see it. Arkansas’s complaint characterizes the arrangement as a two-stage sequence, with one platform serving as the place contact starts and the other as the place it escalates. Discord disputes the allegations against it, and none of these characterizations has been tested at trial.
For a parent, the practical consequence is simple: what you can see inside Roblox may not be where the significant conversation happened. Families frequently discover the Roblox side first and the Discord side later.
Where Discord sits in MDL 3166
MDL 3166, In re: Roblox Corporation Child Sexual Exploitation and Assault Litigation, was created by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on December 12, 2025 and assigned to Chief Judge Richard Seeborg in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The panel’s order names Roblox Corporation, Discord Inc., Snap Inc., and Meta Platforms, Inc. as the defendants across the transferred actions.
Discord’s role in the litigation became more visible in mid-2026. On July 28, 2026, plaintiffs filed a set of arbitration bellwether complaints on the master docket — a common pleading plus individual bellwether cases naming both Roblox and Discord. Bellwether cases are test cases: they let the court and the parties work through legal questions that apply across many claims before the rest of the docket moves. The arbitration question in these filings is a threshold one, meaning it is about where a case can be heard rather than whether the underlying conduct occurred.
As of August 2026, approximately 177 cases are pending in MDL 3166 before Chief Judge Richard Seeborg in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The litigation is in active discovery, and no ruling has issued on the platforms’ threshold defenses, including Section 230.
The state attorney general suits that name Discord
Two states have sued Roblox and Discord in the same action.
Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita announced suit against Roblox Corp. and Discord Inc. on May 7, 2026, filed in Hamilton County, Indiana. The state alleges the companies represented their platforms as safe for children while knowing predators used them to contact and lure minors, and pleads violations of Indiana’s Deceptive Consumer Sales Act, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief and disgorgement.
Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin announced suit against both companies on June 22, 2026, pleading deceptive trade practices, public nuisance, and unjust enrichment, and seeking injunctive relief and disgorgement.
Separately, four states — Nevada, Alabama, West Virginia, and South Dakota — reached settlements with Roblox in 2026 resolving those states’ regulatory claims. Those settlements do not resolve, and do not pay, families’ individual lawsuits. They also do not involve Discord.
State enforcement actions and family lawsuits run on separate tracks. An AG suit does not create a payment to your family, but the documents those suits generate frequently become public evidence that private cases rely on.
What a parent can check on a Discord account
This is a records question before it is a legal one. Discord accounts hold direct messages, server memberships, friend lists, and connected accounts, and much of that is retrievable through the app’s own settings.
Under User Settings, a parent can review the account’s friend list and blocked users, the servers the account has joined, and any linked accounts or connections. Discord also provides a data request function that lets an account holder request a copy of the account’s data, including message history, delivered by email. A guardian who has access to the account can make that request. Discord’s Family Center, if enabled, shows recent activity — who the account has messaged and which servers it has joined — without exposing message content.
Two cautions matter more than any single setting. First, preserve rather than clean up. Deleting a server, leaving a channel, or removing a contact can remove the only record of what happened. Second, do not confront the other account. A message to an adult who suspects exposure often produces deleted accounts and lost evidence.
Preserve, don’t confront, report
If you believe a child has been contacted or harmed, three steps stand on their own and do not require a lawyer:
Preserve. Screenshot conversations, note usernames and server names, record dates, and keep the device in the state you found it where you can. Requesting the account’s data package through Discord’s settings creates a durable copy.
Don’t confront. Contacting the account, posting about it, or asking the child to explain what happened in detail can compromise both the child and the record. Investigators and clinicians are trained to ask those questions; a parent does not have to be.
Report. The NCMEC CyberTipline at report.cybertip.org, or 1-800-843-5678, takes reports directly, and local law enforcement handles the criminal side. Reporting neither requires nor waits on a lawyer, and it is not a step you have to take in any particular order relative to a civil claim.
If a child is in crisis, the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline is available by call or text, 24 hours a day.
Does it matter that contact started on Roblox?
For most families it matters procedurally rather than morally. Where contact began, where it moved, how old the child was, and what documentation exists are the facts that determine how a claim is evaluated — not whether a parent should have caught it. These platforms were built to feel safe. You could not have known what was happening inside a game.
Families generally may pursue claims on behalf of a minor through a parent or legal guardian. Deadlines vary substantially by state and by claim type, and some states’ deadlines are short. Cases in which the initial contact occurred on Discord rather than Roblox are evaluated individually.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is currently reviewing Roblox-related claims for families nationwide.
Free and confidential. No fee unless there is a recovery. Call (888) 348-2735 or start the confidential screening at roblox claim review. Answered by a parent or guardian — never by your child.
Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources (7)
- U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Transfer Order, MDL No. 3166, In re: Roblox Corporation Child Sexual Exploitation and Assault Litigation, December 12, 2025. https://www.jpml.uscourts.gov/sites/jpml/files/MDL-3166-Transfer_Order-12-25.pdf
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, case page for 3:25-md-03166-RS. https://cand.uscourts.gov/cases-e-filing/cases/325-md-03166-rs/re-roblox-corporation-child-sexual-exploitation-and-assault
- Indiana Office of the Attorney General, “To protect Hoosier children from online predators, Attorney General Todd Rokita sues Roblox Corp. and Discord Inc.,” May 7, 2026. https://events.in.gov/event/to-protect-hoosier-children-from-online-predators-attorney-general-todd-rokita-sues-roblox-corp-and-discord-inc
- Arkansas Attorney General, “Attorney General Griffin Sues Roblox and Discord for Knowingly Profiting from Putting Children at Risk,” June 22, 2026. https://arkansasag.gov/news-release/attorney-general-griffin-sues-roblox-and-discord-for-knowingly-profiting-from-putting-children-at-risk/
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, “Online Enticement.” https://www.missingkids.org/theissues/onlineenticement
- National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, CyberTipline. https://report.cybertip.org
- 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. https://988lifeline.org
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Read next
Attorney Advertising. This page is for general information and is not legal advice; reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship, and no attorney-client relationship is formed until a written engagement agreement is signed. Marin & Murphy Law Firm attorneys are licensed in Rhode Island, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and South Carolina; the firm’s mass-tort practice is directed from its Charleston, South Carolina office. Responsible attorney: Matthew T. Marin, 997 Morrison Drive, Suite 200, Charleston, SC 29403. Cases may be handled together with co-counsel; whether a claim is accepted is determined after review. No representation is made that the quality of legal services is greater than that of other lawyers. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome; every case depends on its own facts.