
FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery
Olympus Scope — Infection Claims
Hospitalized With an Infection After a Scope Procedure?
If you were told it was “just a complication,” Olympus’s federal guilty plea — and $85 million in penalties — tell a different story. In two minutes, you can know whether your case qualifies.
ACTIVE LITIGATION. 250+ patients · most recent filing: June 2026 · deadlines vary by state — some as short as one year.
Were you hospitalized with an infection within 30 days of an endoscopy or scope procedure?
Yes — See If My Case Qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I think so / not sure
Free · confidential · no fee unless there is a recovery · answering doesn’t commit you to anything. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Prefer to talk it through? (888) 348-2735 — free and confidential.
Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin
Partners
You’ll get a straight answer even if it’s “you don’t qualify.” Everything you share is confidential — even if you never hire us. No fee unless there is a recovery; costs are advanced and reimbursed only out of a recovery. If you do qualify, our Olympus scope litigation team requests the medical and hospital records — you don’t chase them.
Qualification depends on what the medical records show — the scope involved, the infection, and the timing. We’ll review them and give you a straight answer either way.
Living Document: This page is updated within 24 hours of any FDA action, MDL filing, new hospital named, or case milestone. Last confirmed review: August 2026.
As of August 2026, no Olympus scope MDL has been filed. Cases are proceeding as individual lawsuits in federal and state courts. The most recent major development is Olympus’s October 2025 Urgent Field Safety Notice disclosing 2 deaths and 5 injuries linked to inadequate cleaning protocols.
Your Filing Deadline Is Based on Your Injury Date — Contact Marin & Murphy Now
Your filing deadline is based on the date of your injury — not the MDL formation date. Call (888) 348-2735 | Online Intake Form
⚖️
See if you qualify
A few quick questions about your scope procedure, the infection you were diagnosed with, and whether you were hospitalized. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.
- 🔒 Confidential
- No obligation
- ⏱ ~2 minutes
Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime
What Is the Current Status of the Olympus Scope Lawsuit in 2026?
No Olympus scope MDL has been filed or is pending as of April 2026. The JPML docket does not list any pending Olympus scope consolidation petition as of this writing. However, the litigation is active and moving toward coordinated resolution on a confirmed timeline. Individual cases are proceeding in federal and state courts. In mass tort litigation generally, a large number of related federal cases can later be consolidated before a single judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings. No such consolidation has been ordered in the Olympus scope litigation, however, and whether one is sought or granted is not something any firm can promise.
Individual Cases Proceeding in 2026
Olympus scope cases are being filed and litigated as individual lawsuits in federal and state courts. There is currently no MDL and no class action. Your filing deadline is set by your state’s statute of limitations — based on the date of your injury, not on any consolidation — so it is important to have your timing reviewed promptly.
Olympus Urgent Field Safety Notice — 2 Deaths, 5 Injuries
Olympus issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice on October 14—17, 2025, disclosing 2 deaths and 5 injuries linked to inadequate cleaning of its endoscope accessories. The UFSN specifically acknowledged that prior cleaning and reprocessing protocols were insufficient to prevent contamination, and required facilities to implement 10x magnification inspection during reprocessing. This is the most significant Olympus regulatory disclosure since the 2018 DOJ guilty plea. (Source: Olympus Urgent Field Safety Notice, October 14—17, 2025.)
Olympus Litigation Timeline — Key Public-Record Events
Feb 2015
The FDA issues a Safety Communication on duodenoscope reprocessing and subsequently orders Olympus to conduct postmarket surveillance under Section 522 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Jul 2017
A King County, Washington jury returns a $6.6 million verdict against Virginia Mason Medical Center and awards $1 million to the Bigler family; the jury rejects the design-defect claim against Olympus.
Jan 2018
The court grants the Bigler family a new trial after finding Olympus withheld internal 2008 safety emails; the claims are later resolved in a confidential settlement.
Mar 2018
An FDA warning letter finds Olympus established zero of the surveillance sites required by the Section 522 order.
Dec 2018
Olympus Medical Systems Corporation pleads guilty to three counts of distributing misbranded medical devices and pays $85 million in penalties; former executive Hisao Yabe pleads guilty to one count.
Dec 2024
Olympus initiates a Class I recall of the MAJ-891 Forceps/Irrigation Plug covering 30,140 U.S. units; more than 120 injuries and one confirmed death have been associated with the device.
Oct 2025
Olympus issues a worldwide Urgent Field Safety Notice for TJF-series duodenoscopes (TJF-Q190V, TJF-Q290V, TJF-Q170V), confirming 2 deaths and 5 serious injuries and acknowledging that prior reprocessing protocols were insufficient.
Aug 2026
Current status: no Olympus scope MDL has been formed before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; cases continue as individual lawsuits in federal and state courts.
Member-case ledger: individual Olympus scope lawsuits on the public record
As of August 31, 2026: 4 individual product-liability actions against Olympus America have been filed in federal court since January 2025 and are indexed in the public RECAP archive of PACER dockets; 1 was filed in the last 30 days, 3 in 2026. There is no MDL and no class action: each case proceeds on its own docket in the district where it was filed (E.D. Pa., N.D. Ill., D. Conn., W.D. Wash.). State-court filings are not indexed here.
New federal cases by month, 2026 — 05/2026: 1 · 07/2026: 1 · 08/2026: 1.
| Case | District | First filed | Docket |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nichols v. Olympus America | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-28 | 2:26-cv-06451 |
| Hopkins v. Olympus America | N.D. Ill. | 2026-07-09 | 1:26-cv-08098 |
| Shapiro v. Olympus America | D. Conn. | 2026-05-13 | 3:26-cv-00729 |
| Bruto da Costa v. Olympus America | W.D. Wash. (refiled N.D. Ill. 2025-10-02; W.D. Wash. 2026-06-05) | 2025-05-14 | 2:25-cv-00903 |
Method and limits. Compiled by Marin & Murphy Law Firm from the Free Law Project’s RECAP archive of PACER dockets (CourtListener), searched for actions captioned against Olympus America or Olympus Corporation of the Americas filed since January 1, 2024, excluding employment, patent, insurance, bankruptcy and False Claims Act matters that share the name. A plaintiff whose case was refiled or transferred is counted once, under the district of first filing. RECAP indexes only dockets that have been retrieved from PACER and does not include state courts, so this ledger is a floor, not a census. Case names are public court records; no client of the firm is identified here. Refreshed weekly; blank docket text is counted, never characterized.
Read next
Related Olympus scope lawsuit resources
- Olympus scope lawsuit overview
- Infection after an ERCP procedure
- What CRE is and why it matters
- FDA Warning Letters to Olympus: What They Mean for Litigation
- Olympus Criminal History and Federal Guilty Plea
- Olympus MAJ-891 Forceps/Irrigation Plug
- Olympus’s 2025 field safety notice
- How Olympus failed to report adverse events
- FDA detention of Olympus products
- How duodenoscopes work
- Hospital notified you of possible exposure
- Bronchoscope contamination lawsuit
- colonoscopy
- National MAUDE adverse event analysis
- Device disintegration claims
- Valuing an Olympus scope infection claim