Upper GI endoscopes, also called gastroscopes, are a confirmed device class in the Olympus scope infection litigation. Patients who developed a confirmed infection within 30 days of a gastroscopy or upper endoscopy (EGD) performed with an Olympus gastroscope on or after January 1, 2015, and who required inpatient hospitalization and IV antibiotic treatment, may have a product liability claim against Olympus Corporation. The hospital is not the defendant.

Matt Marin, Founding Partner, Marin & Murphy Law Firm
FIND OUT IF YOUR CASE QUALIFIES
Free Confidential Consultation No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

Super Lawyers® 2014–2024CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Olympus Scope — Infection Claims

Hospitalized With an Infection After a Scope Procedure?

If you were told it was “just a complication,” Olympus’s federal guilty plea — and $85 million in penalties — tell a different story. In two minutes, you can know whether your case qualifies.

ACTIVE LITIGATION. 250+ patients · most recent filing: June 2026 · deadlines vary by state — some as short as one year.

Were you hospitalized with an infection within 30 days of an endoscopy or scope procedure?

Yes — See If My Case Qualifiesfree · takes 2 minutes
I think so / not sure

Free · confidential · no fee unless there is a recovery · answering doesn’t commit you to anything. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Attorney Matthew T. MarinPrefer to talk it through? (888) 348-2735 — free and confidential.

Attorneys Stefanie A. Murphy and Matthew T. Marin of Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Stefanie A. Murphy & Matthew T. Marin

Partners

You’ll get a straight answer even if it’s “you don’t qualify.” Everything you share is confidential — even if you never hire us. No fee unless there is a recovery; costs are advanced and reimbursed only out of a recovery. If you do qualify, our Olympus scope litigation team requests the medical and hospital records — you don’t chase them.

Qualification depends on what the medical records show — the scope involved, the infection, and the timing. We’ll review them and give you a straight answer either way.

Upper GI endoscopes, also called gastroscopes, are a confirmed device class in the Olympus scope infection litigation. Patients who developed a confirmed infection within 30 days of a gastroscopy or upper endoscopy (EGD) performed with an Olympus gastroscope on or after January 1, 2015, and who required inpatient hospitalization and IV antibiotic treatment, may have a product liability claim against Olympus Corporation. The hospital is not the defendant.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

(888) 348-2735

Contact Marin & Murphy today for a free case evaluation.

Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

⚖️

See if you qualify

A few quick questions about your scope procedure, the infection you were diagnosed with, and whether you were hospitalized. This is the initial intake screening, not a full case review. Most people finish in about two minutes.

  • 🔒 Confidential
  • No obligation
  • ⏱ ~2 minutes

Get started

Marin & Murphy Law Firm · Free & confidential · Stop messages anytime

7

Hospitals Named (Senate HELP)

70–80%

Olympus U.S. Endoscope Share

$85M

Criminal Penalty (DOJ 2018)

70–80%

Gastroscopies via Olympus

Are Olympus Gastroscopes Included in the Scope Infection Lawsuit?

Yes. Upper GI endoscopes, including gastroscopes used for EGD (esophagogastroduodenoscopy) procedures, are a confirmed device class in this litigation (confirmed April 6, 2026). Gastroscopy is used to examine the esophagus, stomach, and first part of the small intestine (duodenum) — diagnosing conditions including GERD, peptic ulcers, Barrett’s esophagus, stomach cancer, and H. pylori infection.

Approximately 6 to 7 million gastroscopies are performed annually in the United States. Olympus gastroscope models include the GIF-series (GIF-HQ190, GIF-H290, GIF-Q165) and other upper GI endoscopes. Like all flexible endoscopes, gastroscopes contain hollow internal channels including biopsy and suction channels that cannot be heat-sterilized. Standard high-level disinfection leaves roughly 15% of patient-ready duodenoscopes contaminated with gastrointestinal bacteria even when hospital staff follow manufacturer instructions exactly (Source: Larsen S, et al., EClinicalMedicine. 2020;25:100451.

PMID: 32954234). Gastroscopes are no cleaner: a 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis found gastroscope working channels contaminated at a pooled rate of roughly 28% even after manufacturer-recommended reprocessing (Source: Goyal H, et al., Endoscopy International Open. 2022;10(06):E840–E853. PMID: 35692921). The biopsy and suction channels are a documented site of persistent contamination; an 8-year study of duodenoscopes — instruments that share the same channels as gastroscopes — confirmed those channels as the primary contamination sites (Source: van der Ploeg et al., Gut, March 2024, PMID 38182137).

What Is the Olympus Scope Lawsuit?

Olympus Corporation — which supplies approximately 70–80% of all endoscopes used in U.S. hospitals — is the subject of pending product liability litigation arising from contamination failures across its flexible endoscope line, including gastroscopes. In December 2018, Olympus Medical Systems Corporation pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing misbranded medical devices and paid $85 million in criminal penalties, admitting it failed to file FDA-required adverse-event reports (Source: DOJ press release, December 10, 2018; Case No. 2:18-cr-00727-SRC, U.S. District Court, D.N.J.).

In October 2025, Olympus issued an Urgent Field Safety Notice for current-generation TJF-series duodenoscopes, admitting that prior reprocessing protocols were insufficient and that hospitals were now required to use 10X magnification tools to properly inspect the scopes — tools they had never previously been told were necessary. The notice confirmed 2 deaths and 5 serious injuries linked to current-generation scopes (Source: Olympus Urgent Field Safety Notice, October 14–17, 2025).

The FDA’s December 2024 Class I Recall of the MAJ-891 Forceps/Irrigation Plug covered 30,140 units distributed in the U.S., with 120+ reported injuries and 1 confirmed death (Source: FDA Recall Z-0905-2025). Stat 10 from the Key Statistics Pull List: Olympus pleaded guilty in December 2018 to three counts of distributing misbranded medical devices and paid $85 million in penalties — admitting it failed to file FDA-required adverse-event reports (Source: DOJ press release).

What Did Olympus Know About Upper Endoscope Contamination?

The 8-year a Dutch tertiary-care hospital retrospective study found that by 2022, 94.7% of patient-ready endoscopes showed measurable bacterial contamination of any type (AM20 contamination — any-organism, not patient-origin bacteria specifically). The patient-origin bacteria (MGO) contamination rate ranged from 14.3% to 47.5% annually. All manufacturer-recommended interventions — disposable endcap designs, new automated reprocessing machines, and staff audits — failed to produce a meaningful reduction in contamination rates over the entire 8-year study period (Source: van der Ploeg et al., Gut, March 2024, PMID 38182137).

The biopsy and suction channels used in gastroscopy were specifically confirmed as the most frequently contaminated components. The October 2025 Urgent Field Safety Notice applied to TJF-series duodenoscopes. However, the underlying contamination mechanism — biological material surviving reprocessing in scope channels — applies to all Olympus flexible endoscopes including gastroscopes. The legal argument in this litigation is that Olympus — not the hospital — was responsible for providing safe cleaning instructions.

Hospitals reported following the reprocessing instructions provided by Olympus at the relevant time. Whether those instructions were adequate, and whether they were in fact followed in every case, are contested issues that have been examined in litigation and in 2016 Senate HELP Committee findings.

What Qualifying Injuries May Support a Legal Claim After Gastroscopy?

To evaluate whether you may have a legal claim following a gastroscopy or upper endoscopy, the confirmed qualifying criteria are:

  • The procedure must have occurred on or after January 1, 2015.
  • Procedures performed with Olympus upper GI endoscopes (gastroscopes, EGD scopes) qualify. Olympus GIF-series gastroscope models include GIF-HQ190, GIF-H290, and GIF-Q165.
  • A confirmed infection diagnosis is required.
  • Inpatient hospitalization for the infection is required. Outpatient treatment with oral antibiotics alone does not qualify.
  • IV antibiotic treatment during hospitalization is required.
  • The infection and resulting hospitalization must have occurred within 30 days of your gastroscopy. Most patients in this litigation developed symptoms within approximately five days.
  • You must not have been undergoing dialysis or chemotherapy at the time of your hospitalization.

If the scope or any component broke apart during your procedure and required emergency surgery to remove fragments, this may represent a separate product liability claim — contact us to discuss. Even if you believe your filing deadline may have passed, contact us before assuming you have no options.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

(888) 348-2735

Contact Marin & Murphy today for a free case evaluation.

What Should I Do If I Developed an Infection After a Gastroscopy?

  1. Request your gastroscopy procedure records. Ask for the endoscopy report identifying the specific Olympus scope model used. Gastroscope model numbers begin with GIF on Olympus equipment.
  2. Preserve your infection records. Obtain all hospitalization records: blood culture results, organism identified, antibiotic treatment records. The specific organism name and resistance profile are the primary connecting evidence.
  3. Note the timing. Record the exact date of your gastroscopy and infection onset date. The 30-day window is the critical threshold.
  4. Do not contact the hospital about a legal claim without consulting an attorney first. Statements to the hospital could affect your case.
  5. Contact Marin & Murphy. Our attorneys evaluate Olympus scope claims nationwide. The consultation is free.

Marin & Murphy Law Firm is investigating Olympus scope infection claims for patients in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and nationwide. The consultation is free and creates no obligation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I file a lawsuit if I got an infection after a gastroscopy or upper endoscopy?

If you developed a confirmed infection requiring inpatient hospitalization and IV antibiotic treatment within 30 days of a gastroscopy or EGD performed with an Olympus gastroscope on or after January 1, 2015, you may have a product liability claim against Olympus Corporation. Upper GI endoscopes are a confirmed qualifying device class. Contact Marin & Murphy for a free consultation.

Olympus GIF-series gastroscopes are the primary upper GI endoscope models involved. Confirmed models include GIF-HQ190, GIF-H290, and GIF-Q165. If your procedure report identifies an Olympus GIF-series scope, that procedure uses an upper GI endoscope confirmed as a qualifying device class in this litigation.

Gastroscopes contain hollow biopsy and suction channels that cannot be heat-sterilized. Bacteria from previous patients survive in these channels despite reprocessing. Peer-reviewed research confirms biopsy and suction channels as the most contaminated endoscope components, with patient-origin bacteria rates of 14.3–47.5% annually despite all manufacturer-recommended interventions (Source: van der Ploeg et al., Gut, 2024, PMID 38182137).

Qualifying criteria: gastroscopy on or after January 1, 2015 using an Olympus gastroscope; confirmed infection; inpatient hospitalization; IV antibiotic treatment; infection onset within 30 days. No active dialysis, chemotherapy, or abdominal procedure in 30 days before the gastroscopy.

Both are product liability claims against Olympus arising from the same contamination mechanism. ERCP scopes carry higher risk due to the elevator mechanism design defect. Gastroscopy claims qualify under the same litigation framework and co-counsel agreement with identical qualifying criteria.

Bacteria that may be transmitted include CRE, ESBL-producing bacteria, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and other gastrointestinal bacteria surviving in scope channels. CRE bloodstream infections carry a mortality rate approaching 50% per the CDC (Source: CDC MMWR Vital Signs, March 2013).

Statute of limitations varies by state: Tennessee 1 year; most states 2–3 years. Even if you believe your deadline has passed, contact Marin & Murphy before assuming you have no options.

Olympus Corporation is the defendant — not the hospital or treating physician. Olympus pleaded guilty in December 2018 to distributing misbranded medical devices and paid $85 million in criminal penalties. The hospital and physician followed Olympus’s instructions exactly.

Free Confidential Evaluation — No Fee Unless There Is a Recovery

(888) 348-2735

Contact Marin & Murphy today for a free case evaluation.

Matthew T. Marin, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Stefanie A. Murphy, J.D. — Admitted in Rhode Island, Connecticut, and Massachusetts

Attorney Advertising. Marin & Murphy Law Firm. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship — that relationship is formed only by a signed written agreement. The attorneys of Marin & Murphy Law Firm are licensed in Rhode Island, South Carolina, Connecticut, and Massachusetts. We evaluate potential claims nationwide; for matters arising in states where our attorneys are not admitted, we associate with or refer to locally licensed co-counsel and do not ourselves practice law in those jurisdictions.

Submitting the contact form or contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship. Representation is offered on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery, though a client may be responsible for case costs and expenses. The statute of limitations may sharply limit the time to file a claim. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome, and no outcome is guaranteed. Responsible attorney: Matthew T.

Marin, Marin & Murphy Law Firm (Rhode Island).

Sources

  1. FDA: Infections Associated with Reprocessed Duodenoscopes
  2. FDA: Two Warning Letters to Olympus Over Endoscope Reprocessing
  3. U.S. Senate HELP Committee Report on Duodenoscopes
  4. CDC: About Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE)
  5. Larsen S, Russell RV, Ockert LK, Spanos S, Travis HS, Ehlers LH, Mærkedahl A. Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jul 15;25:100451. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100451. PMID: 32954234. PMCID: PMC7486302.