Uterine Cancer and Relaxer Use: What the Studies Looked At, and What Belongs With Your Doctor

CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Consultation

Warning signs belong with your doctor. The lawsuit question is simpler.

Symptoms are a conversation with your doctor, not this page. Whether you can bring a claim turns on one question about relaxer use.

Active litigation — no settlement. MDL 3060 underway · 12,381 cases pending · filing deadlines vary by state and run from when you knew or should have known.

Did you get relaxers — perms, the white cream — every few weeks, for years?

That one question decides most of it. It seems like nobody ever told you the risk was anything worse than a scalp burn.

See where I standfree · confidential · 2 minutes · an honest answer either way
What the lawsuit is actually about →

No receipts needed · you don’t have to remember every brand · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Every inquiry gets a personal review and a straight answer — including “not yet” or “no” — free and without obligation.

Claims are brought against the companies that made and sold chemical relaxers — not against your stylist, your salon, or the person who did your hair growing up. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms. No settlement has been announced and no trial has been held; every case depends on its own facts. This page does not diagnose anything. Attorney Advertising.

This page is about a lawsuit — it is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor.

Lawsuits consolidated in federal court in Chicago (MDL 3060) allege that long-term use of chemical hair relaxers is associated with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and related conditions. As of October 2026 the cases are in pretrial proceedings; no trial has been held and no settlement has been announced. The allegations have not been proven, and each case depends on its own facts.

This page is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor. It lists no symptoms and interprets none, and that is deliberate rather than cautious: a law firm sorting what you have noticed into “worrying” and “fine” would be doing something it is not qualified to do. If something has changed, the person who can examine you is the only person who can answer it, and no webpage — this one included — is a substitute for that appointment. Everything below is about the research and the docket.

What the studies actually measured

The largest, an NIH cohort study published in 2022, enrolled 33,947 women aged 35 to 74 who still had a uterus, asked about hair product use, and followed them an average of 10.9 years to see who received a uterine cancer diagnosis. Over that period, 378 did.

Comparing frequent users of straightening products — more than four times in the previous twelve months — with never-users, the researchers reported a hazard ratio of 2.55 (95% CI = 1.46 to 4.45). NIH put that in absolute terms: an estimated 1.64% of never-users developing uterine cancer by age 70, against 4.05% of frequent users.

A separate 2023 study of nearly 45,000 Black women, followed up to 22 years, found relaxer use more than twice a year or longer than five years was associated with “a greater than 50% increased risk of uterine cancer.”

Study findings and adverse-event reports describe associations; they are not verified causation.

Notice what is absent: a symptom, a screening test, a threshold, or a rule about when to be seen. The studies compared groups over years. They were not designed to guide an individual decision, and using them that way misreads them.

Why “talk to a doctor” is not a brush-off

It sounds like what a website says to avoid saying anything. Here is why it carries weight here, in published numbers rather than adjectives.

The American Cancer Society reports that uterine corpus cancer incidence “continues to increase in Black women by 2% per year,” that the risk of cancer death for Black individuals is “two-fold that of White individuals” for uterine corpus cancer, and that five-year survival differs sharply — 63% versus 84%. The National Cancer Institute found Black women “twice as likely to die of uterine cancer overall.”

Those gaps have many causes. But they are why the advice is not generic here. Being seen, and taken seriously when you are seen, is where the difference gets made.

If you have been dismissed before

It sounds like you may have been told before — possibly more than once — that what you described was normal, or stress, or something to keep an eye on. That history shapes how the next appointment goes, and it is worth naming out loud before it shapes it again.

Three practical things — none of them medical advice, all about record-keeping:

• Write the timeline down before you go. Dates, what changed, how long it lasted. A written record is harder to compress into “she seems fine.”
• Ask what was documented. You are entitled to your records, and the note is the paper trail any later legal review depends on.
• Bring someone if you can. A second person changes the dynamic, and remembers what you did not.

The legal question is a separate question

Whether relaxers are connected to uterine cancer as a matter of law is being decided in federal court in Chicago, on a schedule that has nothing to do with your health decisions. Defendants have asked the court to exclude the plaintiffs’ scientific experts; that motion was briefed in June 2026 and is undecided. Case-specific expert discovery closes November 16, 2026, and summary judgment motions are due December 16, 2026.

None of that should influence when you seek care, and care should never wait on a legal question. The MDL 3060 tracker follows the docket so you do not have to.

What a legal review looks at

A review is a phone call. It takes about two minutes to start, asks for no receipts, no brand names and no letter from a doctor, and a person calls you back — usually within a business day, with an answer either way. What it works from:

• Used a chemical hair relaxer at least four times a year for at least two years.
• A diagnosis of uterine, endometrial or ovarian cancer, documented in records.
• Some way to place the relaxer use in time — years, salon, brand, or your own account.
• Willingness to have records requested with your written permission.

Whether you qualify is decided by a review of your facts, not a webpage. The consultation is free and confidential, and there is no fee unless there is a recovery. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms.

And the question underneath the question, answered once: a claim here is brought against the companies that made and sold chemical relaxers. It is not brought against your stylist, your mother, or the person who did your hair growing up. Would it be wrong to find out where you stand before deciding anything?

Frequently Asked Questions

Cases are handled on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.