Free, No-Obligation Hair Relaxer Claim Review
Free Confidential Consultation
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Consultation
Motions for years? You were told the risk was scalp burns.
Strength of Nature is a named defendant in the federal litigation. One question tells you where you stand.
Active litigation — no settlement. MDL 3060 underway · 12,381 cases pending · filing deadlines vary by state and run from when you knew or should have known.
Did you get relaxers — perms, the white cream — every few weeks, for years?
That one question decides most of it. It seems like nobody ever told you the risk was anything worse than a scalp burn.
See where I standfree · confidential · 2 minutes · an honest answer either way
What the lawsuit is actually about →
No receipts needed · you don’t have to remember every brand · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.
Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7
Marin & Murphy Law Firm
Every inquiry gets a personal review and a straight answer — including “not yet” or “no” — free and without obligation.
Claims are brought against the companies that made and sold chemical relaxers — not against your stylist, your salon, or the person who did your hair growing up. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms. No settlement has been announced and no trial has been held; every case depends on its own facts. This page does not diagnose anything. Attorney Advertising.
Motions relaxer is made by Strength of Nature, a Godrej company, which is a named defendant in the federal hair relaxer litigation, MDL 3060, in Chicago. The complaints allege the makers did not warn about chemicals they associate with uterine and ovarian cancer.
One question decides most of it.
Did you get relaxers — perms, the white cream — at least four times a year for two years or more? Roughly is fine.
free · confidential · no receipts needed · you don’t have to remember every brand · an honest answer either way · no fee unless there is a recovery.
The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
This page is about a lawsuit — it is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor.
Free, Confidential Consultation — no fee unless there is a recovery
Talk to Marin & Murphy Law Firm at (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7 — or use the confidential case review form on this page. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms.
The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
Lawsuits consolidated in federal court in Chicago (MDL 3060) allege that long-term use of chemical hair relaxers is associated with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and related conditions. As of October 2026 the cases are in pretrial proceedings; no trial has been held and no settlement has been announced. The allegations have not been proven, and each case depends on its own facts.
If you are bracing for a sales page, that is fair. This one cites docket entries rather than settlement estimates, and it decides nothing about your case.
What Motions is
Motions is a salon-positioned hair care line whose relaxer products — including its no-lye relaxer systems and touch-up kits — were sold both to professionals and over the counter. Searchers reach this page typing “Motions relaxer lawsuit.” The relaxer products are what is at issue in the chemical hair relaxer lawsuits; the shampoos, foaming wraps and setting lotions are not.
Where a relaxer was applied does not change the screen. Salon clients, home users, and women who did both are measured the same way: how often, and for how long. And the claim runs against the manufacturer — not against the stylist who did your touch-ups.
Who makes Motions
Strength of Nature, LLC and Strength of Nature Global, LLC — a Godrej company since Godrej Consumer Products acquired the business in April 2016. The same portfolio carries African Pride, Soft & Beautiful, TCB Naturals and Just For Me.
Is Strength of Nature a named defendant?
Yes, and it is the defendant carrying the defense’s central motion. Strength of Nature, LLC, Strength of Nature Global, LLC and Godrej SON Holdings appear on the first-wave defendant roster (Dkt. 289) and in current joint-defense briefing (Dkt. 1901) in MDL 3060.
On May 5, 2026, Godrej SON and Strength of Nature filed the defendants’ combined motion to exclude the plaintiffs’ general-causation experts on behalf of all defendants, with thirty-three exhibits (Dkt. 1828). Briefing closed June 16, 2026; both sides have since filed supplemental authority; the court has said it will set a hearing at a later date (Dkt. 1881). Nothing about the litigation’s direction is settled until that motion is decided.
What the complaints allege about this brand
The master long form complaint (Dkt. 106) and the short form complaint adopted by CMO 7 (Dkt. 175) plead one theory against every relaxer maker: that the products contained phthalates and other endocrine-disrupting chemicals, that the makers knew or should have known, and that the labels did not disclose it. The transfer order describes allegations that relaxer use “caused or increased the risk of developing uterine, ovarian, or breast cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, or other injuries to the reproductive system” (Dkt. 291 at 2).
No order and no published study reports a disease risk figure for Motions, or for any single brand.
What the research says
Testing of eighteen hair products marketed to Black women detected 45 of 66 targeted endocrine-disrupting chemicals; 84 percent of those detected were not on the label (Environmental Research, 2018). A 33,947-woman NIH cohort study reported a hazard ratio of 2.55 for uterine cancer among women using straighteners more than four times a year (JNCI, 2022), and a companion analysis reported 2.19 for ovarian cancer (Carcinogenesis, 2021). In absolute terms the uterine finding was a risk by age 70 of 4.05 percent among frequent users against 1.64 percent among women who never used these products.
Study findings and adverse-event reports describe associations; they are not verified causation.
This page is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor.
Do you meet the screen?
- Used a chemical hair relaxer at least four times a year for at least two years. Salon and at-home applications both count.
- A diagnosis of uterine, ovarian, or endometrial cancer — the three core injuries the trial track runs on (Dkt. 946; Dkt. 1944).
- Records establishing the diagnosis and the timeline.
- Whether you qualify is decided on your own facts, not by a webpage.
Fibroids and endometriosis claims sit outside the current federal trial track. That is the shape of the litigation, not a verdict on anyone’s case: they have not been dismissed as a category, and they are worked up and evaluated separately.
Whichever of those describes you, the rest is a conversation. Two minutes to start, and no homework — no receipts, no box, no brand list, no doctor’s letter. Deadlines are set state by state and generally run from when you knew or should have known; that is a fact to check, not a reason to hurry. You get an answer either way.
Free, Confidential Consultation — no fee unless there is a recovery
Talk to Marin & Murphy Law Firm at (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7 — or use the confidential case review form on this page. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms.
The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
Frequently Asked Questions
My stylist used Motions on me. Am I the one with the claim, not the salon?
The claims in this litigation run against the manufacturers, not stylists or salons. The person who used the product is the person the screen is about.
I do not know which relaxer my salon used.
Common. Many women can name a brand family but not a product line. Start with what you remember; identification is part of the case work.
What is the expert motion and why does it matter?
It asks the court to exclude the plaintiffs’ general-causation experts. If granted in full it would reshape the litigation; if denied, the cases move toward trial preparation. It is briefed and undecided.
Has anyone been paid?
No hair relaxer settlement has been announced and no one has been paid. Any page that quotes a dollar figure is estimating. What decides a claim is the diagnosis, the use history and the state’s law — not a range on a webpage.
What does a review cost?
Nothing up front. It is a free, confidential consultation, and there is no fee unless there is a recovery. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
Sources
- First-wave defendant roster, In re Hair Relaxer Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig., MDL No. 3060 (N.D. Ill.), Dkts. 289, 1901.
- Defendants’ combined Rule 702 motion on general causation, Dkt. 1828 (May 5, 2026); briefing complete June 16, 2026 (Dkt. 1778); supplemental authority, Dkts. 1941, 1980; hearing to be set (Dkt. 1881).
- JPML Transfer Order quoted at Dkt. 291 at 2 (Nov. 13, 2023).
- Master Long Form Complaint, Dkt. 106 (May 15, 2023); CMO 7, Dkt. 175.
- Mem. Op. & Order on core injuries, Dkt. 946 (Nov. 13, 2024); Dkt. 1944 (June 22, 2026).
- Strength of Nature brand portfolio, strengthofnature.com (pulled Aug. 25, 2026).
- Godrej Consumer Products acquisition of Strength of Nature (Apr. 1, 2016).
- “Use of Straighteners and Other Hair Products and Incident Uterine Cancer,” JNCI 2022;114(12):1636–1645.
- “Use of hair products in relation to ovarian cancer risk,” Carcinogenesis 2021;42(9):1189–1195.
- “Measurements of Endocrine Disrupting and Asthma-Associated Chemicals in Hair Products Used by Black Women,” Environmental Research 2018.
Cases are handled on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
Attorney admissions: Matthew T. Marin — RI, CT, MA, SC, U.S.D.C. D.R.I. · Stefanie A. Murphy — RI, CT, MA, U.S.D.C. D.R.I./D.Conn./D.Mass.
Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Attorney Advertising. This website and its contents are intended to provide general information about Marin & Murphy Law Firm and about legal developments in the chemical hair relaxer litigation. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and nothing on this page creates an attorney-client relationship. No attorney-client relationship is formed by sending information through this site, by telephone, or by any form on it; an attorney-client relationship is created only by a written agreement signed by you and the firm.
Prior results do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome in any other matter. Every case is different and is decided on its own facts. Statements on this page about the status of litigation describe allegations that have not been proven and court filings that speak for themselves.
Marin & Murphy Law Firm is licensed to practice in the states identified on this site. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms. Cases are handled on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.
This page is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor. The attorney responsible for this advertisement is Matthew T. Marin, Esq.
