Looking Into This for Your Mother

CALL 24/7(888) 348-2735

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit — Free, Confidential Consultation

Asking for your mother, or your daughter?

You can ask on her behalf — the same one question decides most of it, and an honest answer either way.

Active litigation — no settlement. MDL 3060 underway · 12,381 cases pending · filing deadlines vary by state and run from when you knew or should have known.

Did you get relaxers — perms, the white cream — every few weeks, for years?

That one question decides most of it. It seems like nobody ever told you the risk was anything worse than a scalp burn.

See where I standfree · confidential · 2 minutes · an honest answer either way
What the lawsuit is actually about →

No receipts needed · you don’t have to remember every brand · no fee unless there is a recovery. Court costs and litigation expenses are advanced by counsel and repaid from the recovery. You are not responsible for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before expenses are deducted.

Or talk to a person now: (888) 348-2735 — answered 24/7

Marin & Murphy Law Firm

Every inquiry gets a personal review and a straight answer — including “not yet” or “no” — free and without obligation.

Claims are brought against the companies that made and sold chemical relaxers — not against your stylist, your salon, or the person who did your hair growing up. Conversations are confidential. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms. No settlement has been announced and no trial has been held; every case depends on its own facts. This page does not diagnose anything. Attorney Advertising.

This page is about a lawsuit — it is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor.

Lawsuits consolidated in federal court in Chicago (MDL 3060) allege that long-term use of chemical hair relaxers is associated with uterine cancer, ovarian cancer, and related conditions. As of October 2026 the cases are in pretrial proceedings; no trial has been held and no settlement has been announced. The allegations have not been proven, and each case depends on its own facts.

This page is legal information, not medical advice, and it does not diagnose anything. Questions about your health belong with your own doctor. That applies to hers too. Nothing here interprets a diagnosis or symptom.

Two people usually read this page

The first is a daughter — sometimes a niece, a sister, a husband — who saw something about relaxers and remembers the standing appointment, the box on the shelf, the smell. She wants to know whether it means anything before raising it.

The second is a woman whose own use started so early she has no memory of choosing it. Both run into the same delicate part: this sits close to family.

It seems like you may be carrying two things at once that pull in opposite directions. One is a feeling that you should have looked into this sooner — that you saw an advertisement two years ago and scrolled past it. The other is a fear that bringing it up at all will hurt her, or will sound like you are assigning blame inside your own family.

Neither of those needs resolving before you read on. Nothing here moves quickly, and nothing here requires you to say anything to anyone today.

“It started before you could consent”

For a great many women, relaxer use began in childhood. One woman interviewed about the litigation described getting her first perm “at age 5 or 6” and continuing “until age 18.” That was not unusual; it was ordinary.

Here is the part worth being precise about, because it gets mishandled constantly. Products were formulated and marketed for children. Independent testing found relaxers marketed at children “contained the highest levels of 5 chemicals prohibited in the EU or regulated under Proposition 65,” and that 84 percent of chemicals detected were not on the label. A brand like Just for Me was, by name and packaging, aimed at girls.

No parent in a drugstore aisle had that information. It was not on the label — that is the finding, in those words, from the testing.

Follow the actor through that sentence, because it is the whole of what this page is asking you to carry into the conversation. A company formulated the product. A company marketed it to children by name and by packaging. A company decided what went on the label and what did not. Your mother read the label she was given, in a store, and bought what was on the shelf for girls. This litigation is about the first three sentences. It has never been about the fourth.

If you take one thing into the conversation with her, take that.

Study findings and adverse-event reports describe associations; they are not verified causation.

What records actually matter

You do not need a file. But these are what a review works from, and a family member is often the only person who can reconstruct them:

• Years of use, roughly. Decades are fine; precision is not required.
• How often. Every six weeks, every eight weeks, “whenever it grew out.” Frequency is what the screen turns on.
• Where. Salon, kitchen, both — and the salon’s name if anyone remembers it.
• Brands, if known. Household patterns help: what was usually bought, what a stylist used.
• Diagnoses and dates. Cancer, fibroids, surgeries. Records matter more than what anyone was told verbally.
• Photographs. Family photos date hairstyles better than memory does.

Medical records are requested later, with her written authorization. Nobody obtains them because a relative asked.

How to raise it without it landing badly

Three things that tend to work:

Lead with the product, not with her. “There are lawsuits about what was in relaxers, and the companies did not put it on the label” is a different sentence from “the relaxers you used may have caused this.”

Do not arrive with a conclusion. Nobody can say what caused an individual diagnosis, and asserting it invites an argument you will lose. The honest version — the studies found associations across large groups, and that is all — is also the more persuasive one.

Let her set the pace. She may want to think about it, or want nothing to do with it. Both are complete answers, and nothing is moving quickly: case-specific expert discovery in MDL 3060 closes November 16, 2026 and dispositive motions are due that December.

There is one real clock, and it is worth stating plainly so that it does not sit in the room unnamed. Each state sets a deadline for filing, and those deadlines generally run from when a person knew or should have known that a claim might exist — not from the date of the diagnosis, and not from the date of the surgery. Which date that is in her case is a question with an actual answer, and it is one of the first things a review works out. It is a fact about her state’s law. It is not a reason to press her this week.

Consent is not a formality

Intake questions get answered by the person whose history it is, or with her clear consent — on a call she is on, or after she has said yes. A family member can gather facts, sit in, take notes, handle paperwork. What a family member cannot do is enroll someone who has not agreed.

If the person has died, a claim may be pursued through her estate or personal representative, depending on her state’s law and the timing.

The screen

Four things, and approximate answers are fine on all of them. It takes about two minutes to start, needs no receipts and no brand names, and a person calls back — usually within a business day, with an answer either way, including “no”. What it works from:

Whether she would qualify is decided by a review of her facts. The consultation is free and confidential, and there is no fee unless there is a recovery. Some matters may be referred to or handled with other law firms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Cases are handled on a contingent-fee basis: no fee unless there is a recovery. The attorney’s fee is a percentage of the gross recovery, calculated before case expenses are deducted. Case expenses are advanced by the firm and reimbursed to the firm out of the recovery only if there is a recovery. You have no liability for court costs or litigation expenses if there is no recovery, unless a court directs otherwise.